Skip to Content
https://cms.wgbh.org/authenticate/login

Can I be happy to be nappy in Massachusetts?

Charter School Draws Criticism For Disciplining Students Over Hairstyles
Mya Cook, left, and her sister Deanna Cook, right, who attend Mystic Valley Regional Charter School, are pictured in Malden, Mass., on May 12, 2017. The school has drawn criticism for disciplining Black and biracial students who wear hairstyles that administrators say violate the schools dress code.
Boston Globe/Boston Globe via Getty Images

How I wear my hair is my business. Ironically, the commonwealth is deciding it is now legal for me to do so.

Last week, Massachusetts lawmakers wrestled over whether to prohibit discrimination based on Black hair texture and hairstyles. The bill passed the state’s House and is now waiting for a Senate vote, which would make us the fifteenth state to uphold the CROWN Act (Creating a Respectful and Open World for Natural Hair.)

Congress will be making that same decision this week. The House has already passed the CROWN Act in a vote of 235-189 along party lines, which is to say Democrats don't mind if I wear my hair natural, but Republicans do.

The Cook twins inspired Massachusetts’ CROWN Act. In 2017, Mystic Valley Regional Charter School in Malden banned twins Deanna and Mya Cook from playing after-school sports and attending their prom because they wore hair extensions to school, violating school policy. Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey stepped in on the twins' behalf. Healey sent a letter to the school flatly stating that its policy "includes a number of prohibitions that are either unreasonably subjective or appear to effectively single out students of color."

In a milieu of anti-Blackness, discrimination doesn't stop at skin color. It includes our dress style, music, dance, speech and hair, too. And, our children are being humiliated and punished because of racist rules and policies that discriminate against their hair texture and natural hairstyles.

It’s insulting that Black people are being policed by lawmakers, that how we wear our hair is up to a vote. And it’s insulting that racist standards in workplaces, institutions and schools even turned this into a discussion.

The criminalization of Black hair starts early for our children, sports being one of the areas. For example, in 2018, the video of a 16-year-old African American high school wrestler forced to cut off his dreadlocks to compete went viral. The referee, who was white, told the young athlete that he would have to immediately get rid of his dreadlocks, or forfeit the match.

In 2012, Olympic gymnast Gabby Douglas’ hair was the topic of a ton of e-chatter once she stepped onto the Olympic world stage. A tsunami of criticisms poured in about her over-gelled and under-tamed ponytail. And — yes, that very touchy subject for African American women — her nappy edges. The complaint reinforced the misperception of that no put-together and accomplished Black woman with fleecy wooly wild hair could be happy being nappy.

And, in 2007, radio personality shock jock Don Imus insulted the Rutgers women’s basketball team, calling them “some nappy-headed hos.” He struck a raw nerve. “Nappy” derogatorily referenced as a racial epithet, as Imus did, is the other n-word in the African American community.

African American women and girls endure some of the most stringent standards concerning our hair, allowing workplaces, institutions and educators to discriminate against us without repercussion. Still today, femininity and attractiveness are integrally linked to long straight white women's hair, a lauded Eurocentric aesthetic.

And Black women are constantly — and publicly — pushing away from it.

In 2021, NBC Boston anchor Latoyia Edwards started to wear her hair naturally.

“For years, I had straightened my hair as a news anchor at NBC10 Boston and other television stations, an arduous process I believed was an unwritten necessity for Black, female news anchors,” Edwards wrote for the Globe magazine. “This year, I decided it was time — beyond time — to wear my hair the way it feels right to me. For me, that meant braids. Regardless of the style, it’s long past time for Black girls and women to feel empowered to wear their hair how they choose — and for society to embrace them.”

In 2020, Rep. Ayanna Pressley revealed she had the autoimmune disorder “alopecia,” rendering her hairless. Pressley proudly and regally flaunted a bald head. Pressley, known for her signature Senegalese twists — her identity and political brand — was criticized as being “too ethnic” and “too urban.”

Black hairstyles are not criticized when they are being appropriated by white culture — especially when white celebrities wear our coiffed styles. In 1979, actress Bo Derek donned cornrows in her breakthrough film “10.” In 1980, People Magazine credited Derek for making the style a “cross-cultural craze.” In 2018, when Kim Kardashian posted a video of herself flaunting braids to Snapchat, she credited them as wearing “Bo Derek braids.”

While many African American women today wear their hair in afros, cornrows, locks, braids, Senegalese twists, wraps or bald, our hair continues to be a battlefield in this country’s politics of hair and beauty aesthetics.

Black people have been in this country since 1619. It’s a shame both the commonwealth and Congress are voting on the legitimacy of my hair in 2022.


Your gift sparks a virtuous circle

Your donation makes possible the GBH programs you know and love. That programming then motivates someone else to give, funding more programs and inspiring even more people to give. By making a donation today, you accelerate this chain reaction, advancing GBH’s public service mission for the communities of Greater Boston. If you can right now, please consider a donation.
Expand defs>